The truth is what seems to be credible. Even if it happened or not.
That's why it isn't necessary to trust Buford, but it is certainly better.
Whatevs, seems pretty credible to me.
ANYWHO, yes, I think I am going to win the bet. He has already started demonstrating certain changed behavior. For example, the attitude he had toward Mr. Wicks - the British Consul who from Buford and the reader's point of view is the bad guy - was very sarcastic and satiric. He came to take away from the people Buford was studying, which already demonstrates attachment.
Or also when he makes fun of Bobby Boss, a character who can't be referred by his real name, by saying that his agency is the "Bobby Boss Agency."
Let's get certain things straight. In this book it is clear that there are two sides, and we are being persuaded to take one. There's the big, company/governmental side that wants to impose order in these soccer games. And the hooligans side which leans toward passion and madness for something they live for, something they can rely on and gives them a sense of home and nationality. See that? I just leaned or made you lean towards the thug side. Just like Buford.
So basically it's these people
versus these people
I wouldn't know who is madder to me...
No comments:
Post a Comment